cgep homepage

UVA Commonwealth Graduate Engineering Program
end-of-course evaluation - spring 2008


We would appreciate your completing this evaluation for the distance learning class you've participated in this semester.  Your responses are anonymous (unless you send additional comments to the email address at the end of the form).  

1.  Distance learning site where you attend class:

BAE Systems
GMU - Fairfax
GMU - Prince William
IALR - Danville
Knolls Atomic Power Labs
Lynchburg CAER
Merck - Elkton

NIA - Hampton






UVA - Charlottesville
UVA Northern Virginia Center
UVA Richmond Center
UVA Roanoke Center
UVA Southwest Va. Center
UVA Virginia Beach Center
VCU - Richmond
Other
Explain Other

2.  Which course were you enrolled in this semester? 

CE 604 (Thomas T. Baber)
ChE 647 ( Erik Fernandez)
ECE 556 (Scott Barker)
ECE 695 (Mool Gupta)
MAE 625 (Pradip N. Sheth)
MAE/APMA 642 (William W. Roberts, Jr.)
MAE 672 (Robert J. Ribando)
MSE 606 (William Soffa)
MSE 608 (Giovanni Zangari)
SYS 730 (Ginger Davis)

3.  How many distance learning courses have you taken?




4.  Compared to other courses, understanding the subject matter of this course was:



5.  The amount of effort required considering the number of credit hours for this course was:



6.  How clearly were course objectives defined at start of course?


Adequately







10.  Please rate your access to all research/library materials required to complete the course:




Questions 11 through 19 pertain to the instructor for this course.   Please respond to each question using the following rating scale:

1.  Poor or seriously deficient

3. Good or no deficiency of concern

2. Fair or some deficiency of concern

4. Excellent or performance above basic requirements

11.  Apparent knowledge of the subject matter: 
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

12.  Success in communicating or explaining subject matter:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

13.  Degree to which subject matter was made stimulating or relevant:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

14.  Fairness in assigning grades:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

15.  Concern and respect for individuals as students:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

16.  Administration of class and organization of materials:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

17.  Encouragement and management of class interaction:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

18.  Responsiveness to inquiries outside of class:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

19.  Overall rating of this instructor:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

If you are not at a remote site, stop here and make any written comments you wish at the bottom of this form.  Thanks for your help.  Those at remote sites, please continue to the next questions.

Use the following scale to respond to questions 20 through 26 which pertain to your remote site.

1.  Inadequate 4.  Excellent
2.  Adequate; no serious problems 5.  Not applicable
3.  Very Good

20.  The quality of visual reception:









22.  The distribution of course handouts (especially in regards to timeliness)




23.  Course registration procedures:




24.  Course fee payment procedures:




25.  Problem resolution and assistance by the site coordinator:




26.  Responsiveness and support by GTA's for this course:




27.  How helpful was the opportunity for two-way video interaction with faculty and other students?














Please provide any written comments you wish below.  If more space is needed, you may send an email to the address at the bottom of this form.



 

Mail comments to: rfk2u@virginia.edu
university of virginia school of engineering & applied science
university of virginia school of engineering & applied science